TIC 437150434
An uncatalogued eclipsing-binary candidate from TESS.
Eclipsing-binary candidate: 5.2853-day period, a 29.82% primary eclipse, no significant secondary eclipse. Automated cross-checks question this period - see below.
- Surface brightness ratio
- companion faint - no secondary eclipse
- Companion temperature
- below ~2,300 K
- Companion / star radius
- ~0.55
- Face hidden at primary eclipse
- ~30%
- Separation
- ~15 x the star's radius
- Eccentricity
- consistent with circular
Zoomed: both stars drawn about 3x larger than their real size relative to the orbit, so they overlap for longer than the real eclipse lasts. A star's surface never gets dimmer during an eclipse - part of it is simply hidden. What drops is the total light we receive, shown exactly by the readout and bar below from the real light curve; the glow dims with it, exaggerated so small dips show. Colours follow temperature on a stellar colour scale, saturated so the differences show; the star's is its catalogue value (5,793 K). The companion's colour, sizes and orbit shape are estimates from the eclipse depths, duration and timing, assuming central eclipses and spherical stars - good to perhaps tens of percent. Only the relative orbit is shown; both stars really circle their common centre of mass. Animated about 19,027x faster than real on average, slowing down through each eclipse, and starting from where the system is in its orbit right now. Hover to pause.
- Primary2026-10-20 21:48 UTC
- Secondary2026-10-23 13:14 UTC
- Primary2026-10-26 04:39 UTC
Computed from the fitted ephemeris. Approximate - not corrected for your location or for light-travel time across Earth's orbit.
The signal
A repeating, consistent dip in brightness.
Residual scatter 2.543% (observed minus binned median).
Automated cross-checks question this period - see Caveats below.
- Period
- 5.28534 d
- Primary depth
- 29.82%
- Epoch (T0)
- 2230.842 BTJD
- Duration
- 4.08 h
The catalog check
Cross-matched against known variable-star catalogs to rule out anything already listed.
- VSXNot found
- ASAS-SNNot found
- Gaia eclipsing-binary tableNot found
- Gaia variable classificationNot found
- TESS EB catalog (Prsa+2022)Not found
- ExoFOP TOI listNot found
0/6 catalogs list a known variable at this position.
No known variable star or catalogued match at this position.
- Catalogs checked
- 6
- Matches
- 0
The pixel check
Confirms the dimming is on the target star, not a nearby source.
Out/in share one sqrt colour scale; in-eclipse = out-of-eclipse minus difference. TESS sector 34.
- 85.3
- 0.07 px1"
- -0.0075 phase
- TIC 4371504021.75 px, dT 1.5
- 0.80
- 34
The dimming is centred on the target star. No nearby contaminant detected.
- Centroid offset
- 0.07 px
- Difference SNR
- 85.3
- Capable neighbour
- TIC 437150402
- TESS sector
- 34
The Gaia view
A second spacecraft's measurements: how far away the star is, how bright and what colour, and whether its position fits a single star.
It is about 1,905 light years away: the light TESS recorded left it around 1,905 years ago.
Together the two stars give off about 2.8 times the Sun's light in Gaia's band - before correcting for interstellar dust, which only makes distant stars look fainter.
Its colour is close to the Sun's.
Source: ESA Gaia DR3, source 5700612274109389952.
Gaia's measurements fit a single point of light well (RUWE 0.97), as expected for a pair too close for Gaia to separate.
- Distance
- 584 +/- 4 pc
- Light-travel time
- ~1,905 years
- Apparent G
- 12.38
- Absolute G
- 3.55
- Colour BP-RP
- 0.84
- RUWE
- 0.97
- Match offset
- 0.25 arcsec
The ground-survey check
An independent instrument, different years: does real ZTF photometry show the eclipse at the period TESS measured?
- ZTF g (125 pts, 2 outliers)Confirmed (p=0.0052)
Folded at the TESS-measured period of 5.28534 d, every band shows individual ZTF epochs - real observations, years apart - landing far below the baseline brightness and clustered in phase far tighter than chance would produce given how many such epochs that band has (p < 0.01, chance-corrected for the outlier count).
Source: ZTF public light-curve archive (IRSA), independent of the TESS data used to detect this candidate.
Real ZTF ground-survey photometry backs this period: one band shows epochs, years apart, landing more than 5 sigma below the baseline brightness and clustered in phase far tighter than chance would produce given how many such epochs that band has (p < 0.01) - a different instrument finding the same eclipse.
- Bands confirmed
- ZTF g
- Deepest clustered dip
- 37.3 sigma (ZTF g)
- Chance p-value
- 0.0052 (ZTF g)
- Period tested
- 5.28534 d
Fold it yourself
Adjust the period and watch the eclipse appear.
Shown at the true period. The raw light curve needed to re-fold at other periods has not been exported yet - this slider unlocks automatically once it is.
The period the pipeline measured. Drag the slider away from it and the eclipse smears out.
- True period
- 5.28534 d
- BLS period
- 5.28534 d
- Odd/even z
- 1.10
Caveats
Known limitations and things to check.
Cross-check:No eclipse at 2 of 4 covered epochs where the 5.28534 d period predicts one (each under half the typical depth, > 5 sigma below it). The period is probably wrong - the dips seen may be separate eclipses of a longer-period system.
VIIIInstrument
Raw values, fits and technical details.
Instrument
Raw values, fits and technical details.
Full statistics
- 5.28534 d
- 5.28534 dsame
- 29.82% +/- 0.03%seen 2/4
- ML screening score
- 0.957logistic_regression
- < 0.21%none at 5 sigma
- 1.10< 3
- 2.6581 dpower 0.05
- 4.1 h
- Distance (TIC, Gaia-based)
- 593 pc+/- 12
- 12.39 / 11.94
- 5793 K / 1.76 Rsun
- RA / Dec (J2000)
- 08h 13m 33.2s -22d 11m 3s
- 1081.0 / 85.3
- 3,368 ptsover 25 d
Eclipse close-ups
Same flux scale on both panels. Line: binned median. Shown in place of an orbit animation - this pipeline measures eclipses, it does not fit an orbit.
Period alias analysis
Odd/even depth z = 1.10 (gate 3.0): alternate eclipses match, so the BLS period stands.