Star Vetter

TIC 373792319

An uncatalogued eclipsing-binary candidate from TESS.

CleanSurvivorP = 16.19809 d

Eclipsing-binary candidate: 16.1981-day period, a 10.97% primary eclipse, a 2.11% secondary eclipse at phase 0.812.

TIC 373792319 is a candidate eclipsing binary star with an orbital period of 16.1981 days. TESS photometry reveals a primary eclipse that dims the system by 8.98%, along with a secondary eclipse detected at 7.7 sigma significance. The binary-search algorithm identified this candidate with a signal-to-noise ratio of 272.0, while difference imaging analysis confirmed the signal originates near the target location, with a peak signal-to-noise of 90.2 and a centroid offset of 2.7 arcsec. This candidate does not appear in six variable-star catalogs, and the automated pipeline's machine learning screening assigned it a score of 0.72. All data quality checks passed without flagging any concerns, making this a promising candidate for further investigation.

Primary eclipsetotal light 0.889
Surface brightness ratio
0.19
Companion temperature
~4,887 K
Companion / star radius
~0.33
Face hidden at primary eclipse
~11%
Separation
~40 x the star's radius
Eccentricity
at least 0.489
Secondary eclipse phase
0.812 measured, 0.799 in this orbit

Zoomed: both stars drawn about 12x larger than their real size relative to the orbit, so they overlap for longer than the real eclipse lasts. A star's surface never gets dimmer during an eclipse - part of it is simply hidden. What drops is the total light we receive, shown exactly by the readout and bar below from the real light curve; the glow dims with it, exaggerated so small dips show. Colours follow temperature on a stellar colour scale, saturated so the differences show; the star's is its catalogue value (8,360 K). The companion's colour, sizes and orbit shape are estimates from the eclipse depths, duration and timing, assuming central eclipses and spherical stars - good to perhaps tens of percent. Only the relative orbit is shown; both stars really circle their common centre of mass. Animated about 58,313x faster than real on average, slowing down through each eclipse, and starting from where the system is in its orbit right now. Hover to pause.

  • Secondary2026-10-26 08:37 UTC
  • Primary2026-10-29 09:51 UTC
  • Secondary2026-11-11 13:22 UTC

Computed from the fitted ephemeris. Approximate - not corrected for your location or for light-travel time across Earth's orbit.

I

The signal

A repeating, consistent dip in brightness.

observed binned median residuals
0.900.951.001.050-0.4-0.20.00.20.4phase (P = 16.1981 d)relative flux

Residual scatter 16.152% (observed minus binned median).

Clear, repeating eclipses with a consistent period and depth.

Period
16.19809 d
Primary depth
10.97%
Secondary depth
2.11%
Epoch (T0)
2885.083 BTJD
Duration
4.08 h
II

The catalog check

Cross-matched against known variable-star catalogs to rule out anything already listed.

  • VSXNot found
  • ASAS-SNNot found
  • Gaia eclipsing-binary tableNot found
  • Gaia variable classificationNot found
  • TESS EB catalog (Prsa+2022)Not found
  • ExoFOP TOI listNot found

0/6 catalogs list a known variable at this position.

No known variable star or catalogued match at this position.

Catalogs checked
6
Matches
0
III

The pixel check

Confirms the dimming is on the target star, not a nearby source.

Out of eclipse
In eclipse
Difference (out - in)
+ target TIC 373792319x neighbour bright enough to cause the dipo other TIC starsO dimming centroid1 pixel = 21"

Out/in share one sqrt colour scale; in-eclipse = out-of-eclipse minus difference. TESS sector 58.

90.2
0.13 px3"
0.0000 phase
TIC 3737923772.84 px, dT 0.5
0.83
58

The dimming is centred on the target star. No nearby contaminant detected.

Centroid offset
0.13 px
Difference SNR
90.2
Capable neighbour
TIC 373792377
TESS sector
58
IV

The Gaia view

A second spacecraft's measurements: how far away the star is, how bright and what colour, and whether its position fits a single star.

The latest Gaia context file does not include this candidate yet, so there is no Gaia view to show.

V

The ground-survey check

An independent instrument, different years: does real ZTF photometry show the eclipse at the period TESS measured?

The latest ground-survey file does not include this candidate yet, so there is no independent ZTF check to show.

VI

Fold it yourself

Adjust the period and watch the eclipse appear.

0.900.951.001.05-0.4-0.20.00.20.4phaserelative flux
16.19809

Shown at the true period. The raw light curve needed to re-fold at other periods has not been exported yet - this slider unlocks automatically once it is.

The period the pipeline measured. Drag the slider away from it and the eclipse smears out.

True period
16.19809 d
BLS period
16.19809 d
Odd/even z
1.05
VII

Caveats

Known limitations and things to check.

None found

No caveats flagged: this candidate cleared every gate with no named exception. Follow-up observations would still be needed to confirm the stellar parameters.

VIII

Instrument

Raw values, fits and technical details.

Show raw data

Full statistics

16.19809 d
16.19809 dsame
10.97% +/- 0.10%seen 4/4
ML screening score
0.721logistic_regression
2.11% +/- 0.06%phase 0.812, 36 sigma
1.05< 3
1.0167 dpower 0.00
4.1 h
Distance (TIC, Gaia-based)
2737 pc+/- 168
12.96 / 12.36
8360 K / 8.10 Rsun
RA / Dec (J2000)
01h 50m 42.7s +61d 18m 49s
272.0 / 90.2
22,421 ptsover 754 d

Eclipse close-ups

Primary eclipse10.97%
0.900.951.001.05-10-50510hours from mid-eclipse
Secondary (phase 0.812)2.11%
0.900.951.001.05-10-50510hours from mid-eclipse

Same flux scale on both panels. Line: binned median. Shown in place of an orbit animation - this pipeline measures eclipses, it does not fit an orbit.

Period alias analysis

BLS period 16.1981 d
0.900.951.001.05-0.50.00.5
2x BLS 32.3962 d
0.900.951.001.05-0.50.00.5

Odd/even depth z = 1.05 (gate 3.0): alternate eclipses match, so the BLS period stands.

O - C timing

primary eclipses
-2.0-1.00.01.02.0010203040Eclipse number (cycle)O - C (min)

4 eclipses timed, rms 0.97 min, reduced chi-square 2.53 (2 dof): more scatter than the timing errors explain - worth a closer look.

Each eclipse timed by fitting the star's own mean eclipse profile; fitted P = 16.198772 +/- 0.000012 d.

Quick actions