TIC 150230753
An uncatalogued eclipsing-binary candidate from TESS.
Eclipsing-binary candidate: 4.6683-day period (twice the BLS period), a 22.33% primary eclipse, a 16.04% secondary eclipse at phase 0.497.
- Surface brightness ratio
- 0.72
- Companion temperature
- ~5,228 K
- Companion / star radius
- ~0.52
- Face hidden at primary eclipse
- ~27%
- Separation
- ~19 x the star's radius
- Eccentricity
- consistent with circular
- Secondary eclipse phase
- 0.497 measured, 0.500 in this orbit
Zoomed: both stars drawn about 4x larger than their real size relative to the orbit, so they overlap for longer than the real eclipse lasts. A star's surface never gets dimmer during an eclipse - part of it is simply hidden. What drops is the total light we receive, shown exactly by the readout and bar below from the real light curve; the glow dims with it, exaggerated so small dips show. Colours follow temperature on a stellar colour scale, saturated so the differences show; the star's is its catalogue value (5,753 K). The companion's colour, sizes and orbit shape are estimates from the eclipse depths, duration and timing, assuming central eclipses and spherical stars - good to perhaps tens of percent. Only the relative orbit is shown; both stars really circle their common centre of mass. Animated about 16,806x faster than real on average, slowing down through each eclipse, and starting from where the system is in its orbit right now. Hover to pause.
- Secondary2026-10-20 03:22 UTC
- Primary2026-10-22 11:44 UTC
- Secondary2026-10-24 19:25 UTC
Computed from the fitted ephemeris. Approximate - not corrected for your location or for light-travel time across Earth's orbit.
The signal
A repeating, consistent dip in brightness.
Residual scatter 770824993145904.125% (observed minus binned median).
Alternate eclipses differ in depth, so the true period is twice the search period.
- Period
- 4.66830 d
- Primary depth
- 22.33%
- Secondary depth
- 16.04%
- Epoch (T0)
- 1628.372 BTJD
- Duration
- 2.88 h
The catalog check
Cross-matched against known variable-star catalogs to rule out anything already listed.
- VSXNot found
- ASAS-SNNot found
- Gaia eclipsing-binary tableNot found
- Gaia variable classificationNot found
- TESS EB catalog (Prsa+2022)Not found
- ExoFOP TOI listNot found
0/6 catalogs list a known variable at this position.
No known variable star or catalogued match at this position.
- Catalogs checked
- 6
- Matches
- 0
The pixel check
Confirms the dimming is on the target star, not a nearby source.
Out/in share one sqrt colour scale; in-eclipse = out-of-eclipse minus difference. TESS sector 12.
- 139.0
- 0.11 px2"
- -0.0075 phase
- TIC 1502379251.16 px, dT 0.7
- 0.93
- 12
The dimming is centred on the target star. No nearby contaminant detected.
- Centroid offset
- 0.11 px
- Difference SNR
- 139.0
- Capable neighbour
- TIC 150237925
- TESS sector
- 12
The Gaia view
A second spacecraft's measurements: how far away the star is, how bright and what colour, and whether its position fits a single star.
It is about 3,900 light years away: the light TESS recorded left it around 3,900 years ago.
Together the two stars give off about 2.1 times the Sun's light in Gaia's band - before correcting for interstellar dust, which only makes distant stars look fainter.
Its colour is redder than the Sun's, which usually means cooler - though dust along the way also reddens light.
Source: ESA Gaia DR3, source 6000639413605423744.
Gaia's measurements fit a single point of light well (RUWE 0.97), as expected for a pair too close for Gaia to separate.
- Distance
- 1,196 +/- 31 pc
- Light-travel time
- ~3,900 years
- Apparent G
- 14.27
- Absolute G
- 3.88
- Colour BP-RP
- 1.02
- RUWE
- 0.97
- Match offset
- 0.14 arcsec
The ground-survey check
An independent instrument, different years: does real ZTF photometry show the eclipse at the period TESS measured?
No ZTF observations at this position (declination -43.8 deg) - likely too far south for ZTF's footprint, which covers the sky north of roughly -31 deg. Not a mark against the candidate, just a gap in ground-survey coverage.
Fold it yourself
Adjust the period and watch the eclipse appear.
Shown at the true period. The raw light curve needed to re-fold at other periods has not been exported yet - this slider unlocks automatically once it is.
The period the pipeline measured. Drag the slider away from it and the eclipse smears out.
- True period
- 4.66830 d
- BLS period
- 2.33415 d
- Odd/even z
- 4.17
Caveats
Known limitations and things to check.
- Period alias:Odd/even eclipse-depth z-score is 4.17 (gate > 3.0): alternating eclipses differ significantly in depth, the signature of a true period double what BLS found. Pixel-check confirmation and eclipse timing are unaffected - report the corrected period, 4.668305 d, in any write-up.
VIIIInstrument
Raw values, fits and technical details.
Instrument
Raw values, fits and technical details.
Full statistics
- 4.66830 d
- 2.33415 dalias
- 22.33% +/- 1.77%seen 4/4
- ML screening score
- 0.381logistic_regression
- 16.04% +/- 0.53%phase 0.497, 30 sigma
- 4.17> 3: alias
- 13.9477 dpower 0.03
- 2.9 h
- Distance (TIC, Gaia-based)
- 1236 pc+/- 48
- 14.28 / 13.75
- 5753 K / 1.81 Rsun
- RA / Dec (J2000)
- 15h 26m 37.3s -43d 45m 50s
- 235.7 / 139.0
- 1,077 ptsover 28 d
Eclipse close-ups
Same flux scale on both panels. Line: binned median. Shown in place of an orbit animation - this pipeline measures eclipses, it does not fit an orbit.
Period alias analysis
Odd/even depth z = 4.17 (gate 3.0): alternate eclipses differ, so the true period is 2 x 2.3342 = 4.6683 d.
O - C timing
4 eclipses timed, rms 0.11 min, reduced chi-square 0.01 (2 dof): consistent with a constant period.
Each eclipse timed by fitting the star's own mean eclipse profile; fitted P = 4.666346 +/- 0.000386 d.